In a recent development in the NAR lawsuit, a federal judge has granted class-action certification in an ongoing lawsuit against the National Association of Realtors (NAR), which alleges that the NAR and major real estate brokerages have engaged in a conspiracy to artificially inflate commission rates and stifle competition.
The implications of this lawsuit are far-reaching, as they affect the real estate industry and home sellers across the United States. This article will delve into the key details surrounding this case and provide valuable insights into its potential consequences.
The crux of the NAR lawsuit revolves around the allegation that the NAR and prominent real estate brokerages such as RE/MAX, Anywhere, and Keller Williams have conspired to inflate commission rates for home sellers. The purported collusion has led to home sellers being burdened with exorbitant fees for the services rendered by real estate agents.
The lawsuit, seeking damages totaling over $13 billion, represents home sellers who paid a commission between March 2015 and December 2020 in multiple states, including but not limited to Texas, Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, Colorado, Michigan, Florida, Nevada, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Virginia, Utah, and the District of Columbia.
To support the motion for class-action status in the NAR lawsuit the plaintiffs have enlisted the expertise of Nicholas Economides, an esteemed economics professor from New York University (NYU).
Professor Economides has estimated that the aggregate damages for the class in question could reach a staggering $13.7 billion, or potentially even as high as $41.1 billion. This estimation underscores the gravity of the case and highlights the potential impact it could have on the real estate industry as a whole.
The crux of the plaintiffs’ argument in the NAR lawsuit is their claim that sellers’ practice of making “blanket unilateral offers of compensation” to buyer brokers, particularly when a home is sold through multiple listing services, constitutes a violation of the law.
This alleged requirement places undue pressure on sellers to offer higher commissions, attracting buyer brokers, and ultimately leading to inflated commission rates for real estate agents.
Should the plaintiffs prevail in this NAR lawsuit, it could have substantial repercussions for commission rates in the real estate industry. A successful outcome may result in a significant reduction in commission rates, thereby fostering a more open and competitive market where real estate agents are compelled to offer their services at more affordable prices.
However, it is important to note that the NAR and the implicated real estate brokerages will likely mount a vigorous defense, rendering the final outcome uncertain. In light of this uncertainty, homeowners are presented with an excellent opportunity to exercise due diligence in selecting real estate agents who are transparent about their fees.
For home sellers who paid a commission between March 2015 and December 2020 in the states mentioned above, there may be an opportunity to join the class-action lawsuit. Seeking legal counsel is advised to determine eligibility and address any related queries. Additionally, it is recommended that home sellers proactively seek out real estate agents who offer lower commission rates and provide transparent fee structures.
By conducting thorough research and comparing the commission rates charged by different agents, sellers can engage in price negotiations to ensure they receive the best possible deal. The potential outcome of this lawsuit serves as a timely reminder for home sellers to be vigilant, conduct thorough research, and stay well-informed about all fees associated with engaging the services of real estate agents.
In conclusion, the class-action lawsuit against the National Association of Realtors and major real estate brokerages has significant legal implications for the real estate industry and home sellers nationwide.
While the NAR lawsuit’s outcome remains uncertain, home sellers must proactively seek legal advice, research alternative agents, and ensure transparency regarding fees. These steps allow home sellers to position themselves favorably and make informed decisions that align with their best interests in this evolving legal landscape.
System 2 Thinking (S2T) is a boutique Title Industry Advisory Firm specializing in Title Insurance Licensing, Artificial Intelligence, Mergers and Acquisitions, Compliance Advisory, Process Improvement, and Technology Rollouts. We have been market leaders for over a decade, successfully solving the industry’s toughest challenges while providing unparalleled advisory services.
Our partners range from top title agencies, mortgage businesses, and technology startups to Fortune 1000 companies, driving innovation to fuel business acceleration. No matter who you are or your unique challenge, S2T guarantees fast and efficient solutions. Search our comprehensive services today or contact us for a free consultation!